Internal communication can
be an issue regardless of an organization’s size. As the Groundswell
authors describe, information tends to flow down the management ladder, but
getting insights back up to management and encouraging collaboration among
people throughout the enterprise is harder.
As a result, many companies have been encouraging employees to connect
on internal social networks, collaborating on wikis, and contributing to idea
exchanges.
In my professional
experience I have found it very empowering to be allowed to take part in
decision-making communication. Even when
supervisors and managers have good intentions, it seems as though all too often
their plates are just too full. After
all, how can one know how to prioritize items without data or feedback?
More effective
communication – bringing information to the appropriate channels
The example of Best Buy’s “Blue
Shirt Nation” shows how time and money can be saved through the
implementation of internal communication systems. The authors describe various situations where
actions that would have normally taken weeks to resolve were dealt with in a
few days. The BSN solves a variety of
problems and shows employees that their opinions are valued.
I work in a public school
that does not have a union, and over the
years there has been an increase in teacher involvement in
decision-making. The administration has
formed a teacher committee that works with the principals to have more fair and
democratic collaboration. This has
increased employee satisfaction because it shows that our voices are
appreciated and important.
Wikis – working together to
tackle problems
I found it really
interesting how the authors described the Razorfish
CEO’s blog post requesting that people respond with their favorite guitar
solos. The post didn’t serve a specific
business purpose, but it allowed for employees to be connected to the
leadership. This post showed how
management was using creative techniques to engage and interact with employees,
and it goes on from there. Razorfish’s
internal intranet site, which is a wiki with blogs and collaboration spaces,
has allowed for enhanced teamwork between employees and also for management to
monitor the “pulse” of the organization.
The communication channels at Razorfish even allowed for effective
communication as the company went through an acquisition. The wiki
– with its inherent skills of talking and listening - eased the company through
a crucial transition period.
Idea exchanges – change
from the bottom up
Bell Canada created ID-ah!
Which allows anyone in the company to submit an idea and then have the
employees vote on it. This seems like a
brilliant solution to the fact that new technologies may involve a lot of
data-mining. Instead of management being
overwhelmed with thousands of new ideas or suggestions, top ideas can be
harvested based on number of votes received.
From this selection, management can choose which to implement. Employees are involved with decision making
in a more controlled and quantitative fashion.
This shows how internal groundswell creates new ways for people to
connect and work together.
These different strategies
show how there is an increased emphasis on culture within organizations. A common theme throughout the Groundswell
text is that choices should not be centered on technology, but around managing
and changing the way organizations work.
The case studies described in this post show how companies are achieving
a balanced approach to managing their employees in a considerate and
open-minded manner.
Love this post, Amy! Being involved in the decision-making process and being asked for your opinion from upper management and executives certainly makes one feel valued in any workplace. It also shows us that those who may have more knowledge/experience don't know everything and are willing to listen to what others have to say to try to make situations better or flow more smoothly...and intranets certainly make this process more efficient and more effective.
ReplyDeleteI am from a culture which stands for hierarchy and vertical structure, the desire to "be allowed to take part in decision-making communication" is always there. The internal community inside a company can really encourage employees and be a channel to make their voice heard.
ReplyDelete